Refine
Document Type
- Article (2)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (3) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (3)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (3)
Keywords
- S1P (3) (remove)
Institute
Publisher
- MDPI (2)
Niemann–Pick type C1 (NPC1) is a lysosomal storage disorder, inherited as an
autosomal-recessive trait. Mutations in the Npc1 gene result in malfunction of the NPC1 protein,
leading to an accumulation of unesterified cholesterol and glycosphingolipids. Beside visceral
symptoms like hepatosplenomegaly, severe neurological symptoms such as ataxia occur. Here,
we analyzed the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)/S1P receptor (S1PR) axis in different brain regions
of Npc1−/− mice and evaluated specific effects of treatment with 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin
(HPβCD) together with the iminosugar miglustat. Using high-performance thin-layer chromatography
(HPTLC), mass spectrometry, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and western blot analyses, we
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4502; doi:10.3390/ijms21124502 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4502 2 of 31
studied lipid metabolism in an NPC1 mouse model and human skin fibroblasts. Lipid analyses
showed disrupted S1P metabolism in Npc1−/− mice in all brain regions, together with distinct changes
in S1pr3/S1PR3 and S1pr5/S1PR5 expression. Brains of Npc1−/− mice showed only weak treatment
effects. However, side effects of the treatment were observed in Npc1+/+ mice. The S1P/S1PR axis
seems to be involved in NPC1 pathology, showing only weak treatment effects in mouse brain. S1pr
expression appears to be affected in human fibroblasts, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)-derived
neural progenitor and neuronal differentiated cells. Nevertheless, treatment-induced side effects
make examination of further treatment strategies indispensable
Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a versatile signaling lipid involved in the regulation of numerous cellular processes. S1P regulates cellular proliferation, migration, and apoptosis as well as the function of immune cells. S1P is generated from sphingosine (Sph), which derives from the ceramide metabolism. In particular, high concentrations of S1P are present in the blood. This originates mainly from erythrocytes, endothelial cells (ECs), and platelets. While erythrocytes function as a storage pool for circulating S1P, platelets can rapidly generate S1P de novo, store it in large quantities, and release it when the platelet is activated. Platelets can thus provide S1P in a short time when needed or in the case of an injury with subsequent platelet activation and thereby regulate local cellular responses. In addition, platelet-dependently generated and released S1P may also influence long-term immune cell functions in various disease processes, such as inflammation-driven vascular diseases. In this review, the metabolism and release of platelet S1P are presented, and the autocrine versus paracrine functions of platelet-derived S1P and its relevance in various disease processes are discussed. New pharmacological approaches that target the auto- or paracrine effects of S1P may be therapeutically helpful in the future for pathological processes involving S1P.
Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and most aggressive malignant tumor of the central nervous system in adults. The median survival time of patients suffering from GBM is only 14-15 months. Despite a great progress in the technique of resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapeutic drugs, survival time has not been significantly prolonged. Interestingly, the progression of GBM has been associated with intratumoral immune dysfunction states, and the GBM tissue represents a complex formation of tumor cells itself and diverse non-malignant cells such as endothelial cells, microglia or immunocompetent cells from peripheral blood. In that regard, accumulating evidence supports that Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) acts as a key signal in the cancer extracellular milieu. S1P has been intensively discussed to be an important pro-tumoral molecule, since it is involved in proliferation, migration and invasion of both healthy and malignant cells. An increase in S1P has been associated with proliferation and invasion of GBM and other cancers that display a propensity for brain metastasis. S1P binds to five different cell surface G protein-coupled receptors called S1P receptor 1-5 (S1PR1-5), it has been shown in previous studies that particularly the S1PR1 and 2 are involved in regulating proliferation, metastasis, invasion, vascular angiogenesis and maturation of GBM cells and thus play an important role in tumorigenesis. Therefore, we used S1PR1 (ACT-209905, W146) and S1PR2 modulators/antagonists (Compound 16, JTE013) to investigate the role of these S1P receptor subtypes in the growth of human (prGBM, LN18) and murine (GL261) GBM cells to gain insight into the molecular processes of the pro-tumorigenic S1P signaling cascade in GBM cells. Further, we analyzed the influence of the human monocytic cell line THP-1 on GBM cell growth by co-culture experiments together with simultaneous application of S1PR1/S1PR2 modulators/antagonists to determine the role played by S1PR1 and S1PR2 signaling pathways in the interaction between tumor and immune cells. We found that all tested S1PR1/2 modulators (ACT-209905, W146, Compound 16, JTE013) significantly reduced the viability (Resazurine assay) and vitality (Crystal violet assay) as well as the migration and invasion of prGBM, LN18 and GL261 cells in a concentration dependent manner. The growth inhibitory effect of S1PR1 blocking by ACT-209905 was accompanied by the induction of apoptosis in GBM cells seen by increased caspase 3 activity. When S1PR1 antagonist (ACT-209905, W146) was co-administered with S1PR2 antagonist (Compound 16, JTE013) the inhibitory effect was much stronger compared to the single administration. Further, single and dual application of S1PR1 modulator and S1PR2 antagonist caused a stronger inhibition of GBM cell viability and vitality compared to 100 μM Temozolomide (TMZ) as the standard chemotherapeutic for GBM. These results suggest that both S1PR1 and S1PR2 are involved in the growth of GBM cells and that a simultaneous inhibition of both receptors has synergistic effects. In addition, the influence of THP-1 cells as a model for human monocytes/macrophages on GBM cell growth was analyzed since it has been shown that S1P signaling polarizes macrophages to the pro-tumoral M2 phenotype and S1PR1 has been linked to macrophage activation. Co-culture of GBM cells with THP-1 cells or THP-1 conditioned medium significantly enhanced the viability and vitality as well as the migration and invasion of GBM cells in a cell number dependent manner suggesting that THP-1 cells might secrete to date unknown pro-tumoral molecules which stimulate the pro-invasive growth of GBM cells. Our FACS analyses showed that THP-1 cells express not only the CD11b macrophage marker but also CD163 and CD206 as marker for the pro-tumorigenic M2 phenotype. Interestingly, the concomitant application of the S1PR1 modulator ACT-209905 had a significant inhibitory effect on the THP-1 induced increase of GBM cell growth and migration, which argues for a role of S1PR1 in the pro-tumoral characteristic of THP-1 on GBM cells. Immunoblot analyses further showed that blocking of the S1PR1 pathway leads to a reduced activation of several kinases including p38, AKT1 and ERK1/2 whereas THP-1 cells and THP-1 conditioned medium caused an activation of these kinases. To clarify the role of p38, AKT1 and ERK1/2 in the inhibitory effects of S1PR1 antagonists on GBM proliferation and migration in detail further studies are needed. Beside an impact on growth promoting kinases, S1PR1 blocking by ACT-209905 diminished surface expression (Median Fluorescence Intensity measured by FACS) of the pro-migratory molecules CD54 (ICAM-1) and CD166 (ALCAM), and reduced the percentage of CD62P (P-Selectin) positive GBM cells. In contrast, co-culture with THP-1 cells increased ICAM-1 and P-Selectin content of GBM cells which was reversed by ACT-209905 arguing for a role of ICAM-1 and P-Selectin in the migration of GBM cells. In conclusion, our study suggests a role of S1PR1 and S1PR2 signaling pathways in the growth and progression of GBM, improves our understanding of the complex mechanisms of S1P signaling in GBM cells, and gives at least a partial explanation for the pro-tumorigenic effects that macrophages might have on GBM cells combined with potential underlying mechanisms. Thus, this study argues for a further preclinical and clinical evaluation of a pharmacological modulation of S1PR1 and S1PR2 as a new or adjunctive therapeutic principle in GBM.