Refine
Year of publication
- 2023 (2)
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2) (remove)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- laser ablation (2) (remove)
Publisher
- MDPI (1)
Thermal ablation offers a minimally invasive alternative in the treatment of hepatic tumours. Several types of ablation are utilised with different methods and indications. However, to this day, ablation size remains limited due to the formation of a central non-conductive boundary layer. In thermal ablation, this boundary layer is formed by carbonisation. Our goal was to prevent or delay carbonisation, and subsequently increase ablation size. We used bovine liver to compare ablation diameter and volume, created by a stand-alone laser applicator, with those created when utilising a spacer between laser applicator and hepatic tissue. Two spacer variants were developed: one with a closed circulation of cooling fluid and one with an open circulation into hepatic tissue. We found that the presence of a spacer significantly increased ablation volume up to 75.3 cm3, an increase of a factor of 3.19 (closed spacer) and 3.02 (open spacer) when compared to the stand-alone applicator. Statistical significance between spacer variants was also present, with the closed spacer producing a significantly larger ablation volume (p < 0.001, MDiff = 3.053, 95% CI[1.612, 4.493]) and diameter (p < 0.001, MDiff = 4.467, 95% CI[2.648, 6.285]) than the open spacer. We conclude that the presence of a spacer has the potential to increase ablation size.
Introduction
The concept of thermal ablation has proven a minimally invasive alternative or accompaniment to conventional tumour therapy. Patients with hepatic primary tumours or metastases are able to profit from it. Several modalities of thermal ablation exist, including radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and laser ablation. They differ in regards to their indications and their physical backgrounds, yet they all share the same aim: the hyperthermic ablation of tumorous target tissue.
At this point in time the maximum ablation diameter attained in a singular session using a singular applicator is about 30 mm. The maximum attainable volume is about 23 cm3. However, the mean and median of hepatic lesions exceed that number with about 50 mm. Most hepatic tumours therefore cannot be easily ablated in toto.
One of the main limitations of thermal ablation is the periprocedural transformation of vital tissue into a boundary layer. This boundary layer prevents efficient energy transmission into peripheral tissue and thus limits the potential of thermal ablation. The boundary layer is usually located centrally around the ablation applicator. In laser ablation the formation of this boundary layer is called carbonisation.
A technically simple, yet potentially effective approach to delay or prevent the formation of this boundary layer is the usage of a spacer. This perfused spacer cools the central zone surrounding the applicator. Therefore central temperatures remain beyond the point of carbonisation.
Methods
The development of two spacer prototypes took place in cooperation with the AG “Experimentelle Radiologie” of the University Clinic Charité. The first fully closed prototype featured an internal circulation of cooling fluid without tissue perfusion. The second open prototype perfused into tissue through an opened tip.
The conduct of this study included ex vivo experiments on bovine livers (n = 15) by means of laser ablation. Ablation diameter and ablation volume were recorded through MR-guided volumetry and manual displacement volumetry. The mean values of diameter and volume that were recorded when the stand-alone applicator system was used were then compared to the mean values recorded when using the closed spacer-supported applicator system and the open spacer-supported applicator system. The difference in values between the three applicator types were then examined for statistical significance using SPSS.
To exclude covariates a preliminary experiment was conducted which aimed to maximise power input of the laser and time interval while minimising the chance of carbonisation. For that, one of the variables was increased in intervals and the ablation diameter of all three applicator types was measured until carbonisation occurred.
Results
In the preliminary experiment it was found that following the increase of the pre-set power input of the laser a proportional increase of ablation diameter followed. However when increasing power input above 25 Watt almost instantaneous carbonisation of the central tissue occurred. This was the same for all three applicator types.
When increasing the time interval > 10 minutes the stand-alone applicator system showed central carbonisation, which was not the case when using the closed spacer-supported applicator system or the open spacer-supported applicator system. The two spacer prototypes only experienced carbonisation when a time interval of > 25 minutes was set. Thus the comparison of all three applicator types was conducted at 25 Watt and 10 minutes, whereas the comparison between the closed spacer-supported applicator system and the open spacer-supported applicator system was conducted at 25 Watt and 25 minutes.
During the first experiment the stand-alone applicator system achieved mean values of 37.50 mm ablation diameter and 23.61 cm3 ablation volume. This was a statistically significant (p < 0.001) increase to the values either spacer was able to attain: the closed spacer-supported applicator system recorded a mean value of 28.67 mm ablation diameter and 18.12 cm3 ablation volume, whereas the open spacer-supported applicator system recorded a mean value of 31.00 mm ablation diameter and 18.49 cm3 ablation volume. However, setting a longer time interval was not possible when the stand-alone applicator system was used for ablation. Due to this, a second experiment comparing mean ablation diameter and volume between the two spacer prototypes followed.
During the second experiment with a time interval of 25 minutes the closed spacer-supported applicator system attained a mean value of 52.07 mm ablation diameter and 75.25 cm3 ablation volume. These values showed a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference in comparison to the open spacer-supported applicator system with mean values of 47.60 mm ablation diameter und 72.20 cm3 ablation volume.
Discussion
Within the framework of this study it was proven that the presence of a spacer between laser applicator and hepatic tissue was able to achieve a significant increase in ablation diameter and ablation volume. By using a closed spacer an increase in volume by a 3.19 factor of change was possible. The open spacer obtained an increase in volume by a 3.06 factor of change. The concept of using a spacer in thermal ablation as a proof of concept study is therefore valid and suitable for further pre-clinical studies.