Refine
Document Type
- Article (1)
- Doctoral Thesis (1)
Language
- English (2)
Has Fulltext
- yes (2)
Is part of the Bibliography
- no (2)
Keywords
- Band (1)
- Beckenboden (1)
- Netz (1)
- Schlinge (1)
- alloplastische Materialien (1)
- leiomyosarcoma (1)
- malignancy (1)
- morcellement (1)
- recurrence (1)
- survival (1)
Institute
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde u. Geburtshilfe (2) (remove)
Publisher
- MDPI (1)
Background: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare entity amongst malignant gynaecological tumours and is mostly diagnosed after surgery for benign leiomyoma (LM) of the uterus. As minimal invasive surgery is widely used, the morcellation of LM and the uterus is rather common. As there is little known about the impact of the morcellation of LMS on local and distant metastases, as well as overall survival, we carried out a large-scale retrospective study. Methods: A total of 301 LMS cases from the German Clinical Competence Centre for Genital Sarcomas and Mixed Tumours were analysed. We distinguished morcellated and non-morcellated LMS from pT1 and >pT1 tumours. Fine–Gray competing risks regressions and cumulative incidence rates were computed for the time to local recurrence, distant metastases, and patient death. Results: The recurrence free interval in pT1 LMS was significantly lower in the morcellation group with a 2-year cumulative incidence rate of 49% vs. 26% in non-morcellated LMS (p = 0.001). No differences were seen in >pT1 tumours. Distant metastases were more frequently found in non-morcellated pT1 LMS compared to the morcellated cases (5-year cumulative incidence: 54% vs. 29%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in time to death between both groups neither in the pT1 stages nor in >pT1 disease. Subdistribution hazard ratios estimated by multivariable competing risks regressions for the morcellation of pT1 LMS were 2.11 for local recurrence (95% CI 1.41–3.16, p < 0.001) and 0.52 for distant metastases (95% CI 0.32–0.84, p = 0.008). Conclusions: Tumour morcellation is not associated with OS for pT1 tumours. The morcellation of pT1 LMS seems to prolong the time to distant metastases whereas local recurrence is more likely to occur after the morcellation of pT1 LMS.
The aim of this retrospective observational study is to describe and discuss various complications that can arise after insertion of alloplastic materials in the field of urogynecology that require further surgical interventions in order to manage them or to at least improve the quality of life in those women. We were able to collect data on 77 patients who fulfilled the criteria. Medical history, data of clinical findings, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. The most common complication seen as an indication for resecting slings or meshes was de novo overactive bladder syndrome (40%). Other indications seen were lower urinary tract obstruction or obstructive voiding symptoms (21%), chronic pain (21%), and de novo dyspareunia (13%). 36% of the patients had recurrent symptoms (failure) after insertion of alloplastic materials in the form of urinary incontinence or prolapse, 32% presented with vaginal erosions, 2 women had severe signs of infection with abscess formation, another 3 women had urogenital fistulae. Other rare complications after mesh or sling insertion are perforations of the urinary bladder or urethra. Proper case selection is the key factor. The use of meshes and slings seems justified only in patients with known connective tissue weakness and recurrences after native tissue repair. Otherwise, patients will be exposed to unnecessary risk without any expectable improvement to their quality of life. Most of the complications are mainly caused by wrong and inadequate surgical techniques, wrong indications, or missed diagnosis of the underlying problem. In addition, lack of long-term follow-up is usually the cause behind the negligence towards many complications. Therefore, only experienced physicians should be allowed to perform such procedures, and long-term postoperative follow-up is strongly recommended. As slings and meshes are used for procedures of choice as means to improve quality of life, and not for life threatening situations, there is a need for intensive informed consent. All possible alternatives have to be discussed, as do the pros and cons of selected procedures, even the rare complications. Mesh or sling resection is considered to be an effective solution for the management of such complications. It has shown a high success rate in comparison to conservative treatment, and the majority of patients were satisfied and experienced a big improvement in their quality of life. The most common complication after resection is the recurrence of primary symptoms, either urinary incontinence or prolapse. Major or serious intra- or postoperative complications are very rare. All complications were classified and given a code according to the classification system of the international urogynecological association and the international continence society (IUGA/ICS) on 2011. The applicability and practicability of this code were evaluated, looking for ways to possibly improve it or to identify missing parameters. Many patients had more than one code, a problem that entirely torpedoed the idea of “simple” classification. Some complications are not covered individually in the classification, such as failure and recurrence or overactive bladder syndrome. These complications should be included. Many cases began with the same code, despite having different complications. Further sub-classifications should be considered to enable the reader to easily recognize the complication at hand. Patients who came with complications more than one year after mesh or sling insertion were categorized as (T4), regardless of whether the complication arose after 1 year of after 10. Therefore, sub-classifications in the (T4) category are recommended. The “site” category was not applicable in many cases. Furthermore, it is necessary that the severity of a complication is discernible, and should be mentioned in the code. We did not find any correlation between the code given and patient satisfaction. After re-modification and completion, the IUGA/ICS code could be more practical for clinical use, which would allow for the comparison of complications and make the assessment of adverse effects easier for research purposes.